🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are watching closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are moving toward similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban remains "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to enact a bill increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. Even though it warns of the "addictive" nature of these services, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," commented the parliamentarian driving the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. An organization set up by the family of a young person who died after encountering dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are safe and fit for minors," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the local government level amid national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some individuals to mimic this path, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, further nations are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations take a more measured stance. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of the Australian government and others demonstrate that governments globally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.